La Growth Machine is a well-made product and one of the few that treats voice and X as real channels rather than checkboxes. If your process is sequence-driven and multichannel, it does that better than we do. This page is about the place where our approaches genuinely diverge: what happens between choosing a prospect and sending them a message.
At a glance
Entry price
Conflicting figures: ~$133 Basic on aggregators, 490€–1,480€/user/month per a French reseller. No self-serve pricing page found.
Pricing model
Per seat, sales-led
How the AI writes
No generative writing documented. Outreach described as multichannel campaign animation.
Positioning
All-in-one omnichannel acquisition platform with a bundled B2B contact database.
Magic Message writes for the sequence
LGM generates one message from your product description and your persona, then fills in variables for each lead. It is a good version of that idea, and the copy is often better than what a team writes by hand. But the unit of generation is the sequence. Two prospects in the same sequence receive the same argument with a different first name and company.
Spruce generates per prospect. The model reads the profile, picks the angle that fits that person's role and company stage, and writes the message from scratch. Follow-ups are generated too, in the context of what was already said.
Nothing filters the list before the first touch
LGM's enrichment fills gaps in your data. It does not decide whether a prospect deserves an invitation. That decision stays in the import: whoever built the list decided who is in.
Spruce scores each profile against your personas before anything is sent. On a scraped Sales Navigator list that is usually a third of the file, which is a third of your invitation quota that would have been spent on people who were never going to buy.
Priced per identity
LGM bills per identity: 60€ Basic, 120€ Pro. For a solo founder that is fine. For a team of five where each rep sends from their own account it climbs quickly, so do the arithmetic on your actual headcount before comparing headline prices.
Where LGM is clearly ahead
Multichannel. If your process needs LinkedIn plus email plus a call task plus X in one orchestrated flow, LGM does it and Spruce does not. We are LinkedIn only, deliberately. Their enrichment waterfall is also strong.
Which to choose
If you need a real multichannel sequencer and your team is small, La Growth Machine. Spruce fits when your pipeline is LinkedIn, when you sell to more than one persona, or when campaign maintenance has quietly become the job.
Side by side
| Spruce | La Growth Machine | |
|---|---|---|
| Connection requests included | 800 per month, on every plan | No published cap on invitations. Their docs recommend 100–150 a week on a new account and 150–250 on an established one, mirroring LinkedIn's own ceiling. |
| Prospects you can process per month | Not metered separately | This is where their plans actually cap you: 250 enriched leads a month on Basic, 400 on Pro, 1,000 on Ultimate. Worth checking against your real list volume before comparing headline prices. |
| Qualification before the invitation | Every profile is scored against the personas you declared. The ones that do not match are dropped. | Enrichment fills gaps in your data. It does not decide whether a prospect deserves an invitation. |
| Who writes the message | Generated per prospect, from that person's profile | Magic Message writes one message for the sequence from your product and persona, then fills variables per lead |
| Follow-ups | Generated per prospect, within the sequence you configured | Sequence steps written in advance, the same for everyone in it |
| Campaigns to build and maintain | None. There is no campaign object. | One per segment, and the plan caps how many run at once: 3 on Basic, 6 on Pro, unlimited on Ultimate |
| Channels | LinkedIn only, deliberately | LinkedIn, email, calls and X in one orchestrated sequence. La Growth Machine wins this row outright, and nothing in Spruce replaces it. |
| Sending behaviour | Paced over the working hours you define, and skips public holidays | Working hours are configurable. No holiday handling documented. |
| Several LinkedIn accounts | Through linked Spruce accounts | Priced per identity: up to 3 on Basic, unlimited on Pro and Ultimate |
| After the reply | Manual setting on Essentiel. AI setting through to the booked meeting from Professionnel upwards, then closing. | Multichannel inbox from the Pro plan. The replying is yours. |
| Price | 149€ per user per month on Essentiel, or 124€ a month billed annually. 249€ Professionnel, 499€ Accompagnement. | 60€ per identity per month on Basic, 120€ on Pro, and 120€ on Ultimate, the same price as Pro, with the difference being quotas rather than cost. Custom plans from 150€. Two months free billed annually. |
Figures taken from lagrowthmachine.com/fr/tarifs. If you are reading this more than a quarter after publication, check them yourself: pricing pages move faster than comparison pages.
Where they are strong
- Genuinely multichannel, since voice and X sit alongside LinkedIn and email
- A smart SEO play on competitor pricing and review terms
- The enrichment is solid
Where they fall short
- Magic Message writes one message for the sequence, built from the product and the persona, then fills in variables. That is not per-prospect generation
- Pricing is per identity, which climbs fast across a team
- Nothing gates the invitation on qualification
Our verdict
If the problem you are solving is orchestration across channels, La Growth Machine is the better tool. Spruce is the better one when the problem is that every prospect gets the same message. Pick whichever matches the bottleneck you actually have.
Frequently asked
La Growth Machine costs less per seat. Why pay 149€?
Because the seat is not the whole cost. With LGM you also pay for the person who builds the audiences, writes the copy for each channel and keeps the sequences current. That work is real and it recurs every month.
Spruce charges more and removes that work: profiles are scored against your personas before the invitation, and each message is written for the individual prospect. If you already have someone whose job is to run sequences, LGM is the cheaper answer.
Spruce includes 800 invitations a month. Does LGM let me send more?
LGM publishes no cap, so there is no number to hold up against 800. Their documentation recommends 100 to 150 invitations a week on a new account and 150 to 250 on an active one, which is simply LinkedIn's own ceiling restated.
That ceiling applies to both tools. LinkedIn enforces its limits on top of anything you configure, and no tool lifts them.
LGM has AI for writing too. Is that not the same thing?
LGM's AI helps you produce the message for a sequence faster. The message is still one text sent to an audience, with variables filled in.
Spruce has no sequence to fill. Each message, and each follow-up, is generated from the prospect's own profile. Both are called AI, but they do different jobs.
We run LGM today. What does moving involve?
Nothing to migrate in the usual sense, because there is no campaign to rebuild. You describe your personas, set your working hours, connect the LinkedIn account, and Spruce starts.
If your sequences use email and calls, keep LGM for those and let Spruce handle LinkedIn. That is a common arrangement rather than a compromise.
When is La Growth Machine still the better choice?
When you genuinely need multichannel. LGM does LinkedIn, email and calls in one sequence with real fallbacks, and it does it well. If a prospect who ignores LinkedIn should automatically get an email, LGM is the right tool and Spruce is not.
The same goes if you sell into a market where LinkedIn coverage is thin and email is the only reliable way in.
Ready to structure your prospecting?
Join 150+ teams running smarter outbound with Spruce.
Essential plan free for 14 days · Cancel anytime · No commitment